<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying Property Step 3 &#8211; Understanding the Price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Endersby, Recovering Technologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Frith</title>
		<link>http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-12330</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Frith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/?p=299#comment-12330</guid>
		<description>53.03% report no income. The full figures for the employed are:
Income	Distribution
R 1 - R 400	9.10%
R 401 - R 800	13.81%
R 801 - R 1 600	29.93%
R 1 601 - R 3 200	16.49%
R 3201 - R 6 400	12.97%
R 6 401 - R 12 800	9.95%
R 12 801 - R 25 600	4.65%
R 25 601 - R 51 200	2.02%
R 51 201 - R 102 400	0.61%
R 102 401 - R 204 800	0.30%
R 204 801 or more	0.17%
(I dunno how clearly this will come out, but you should be able to get the idea.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53.03% report no income. The full figures for the employed are:<br />
Income	Distribution<br />
R 1 &#8211; R 400	9.10%<br />
R 401 &#8211; R 800	13.81%<br />
R 801 &#8211; R 1 600	29.93%<br />
R 1 601 &#8211; R 3 200	16.49%<br />
R 3201 &#8211; R 6 400	12.97%<br />
R 6 401 &#8211; R 12 800	9.95%<br />
R 12 801 &#8211; R 25 600	4.65%<br />
R 25 601 &#8211; R 51 200	2.02%<br />
R 51 201 &#8211; R 102 400	0.61%<br />
R 102 401 &#8211; R 204 800	0.30%<br />
R 204 801 or more	0.17%<br />
(I dunno how clearly this will come out, but you should be able to get the idea.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Frith</title>
		<link>http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-12327</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Frith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/?p=299#comment-12327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually found the Community Survey 2007 data at http://www.statssa.gov.za/community_new/content.asp?link=interactivedata.asp which hopefully has more recent numbers.

53% of the population aged 16--65 have no income. I removed them from the calculation so that we can consider only the employed population.

Of those with an income, 53% still earn less than R1600; 29% earn between R1600 and R6400; 15% earn between R6400 and R25 600; 2% earn between R25 600 and R51 200; and still the remaining 1% earn more than R51 200.

Actually, those numbers are suspiciously close to the numbers from the 2001 Census in my other post. Maybe the Census numbers are inflation-adjusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually found the Community Survey 2007 data at <a href="http://www.statssa.gov.za/community_new/content.asp?link=interactivedata.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.statssa.gov.za/community_new/content.asp?link=interactivedata.asp</a> which hopefully has more recent numbers.</p>
<p>53% of the population aged 16&#8211;65 have no income. I removed them from the calculation so that we can consider only the employed population.</p>
<p>Of those with an income, 53% still earn less than R1600; 29% earn between R1600 and R6400; 15% earn between R6400 and R25 600; 2% earn between R25 600 and R51 200; and still the remaining 1% earn more than R51 200.</p>
<p>Actually, those numbers are suspiciously close to the numbers from the 2001 Census in my other post. Maybe the Census numbers are inflation-adjusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arbitraryuser</title>
		<link>http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-12326</link>
		<dc:creator>arbitraryuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/?p=299#comment-12326</guid>
		<description>Adrian, thanks for that. 

The issue with those stats is the huge gap between 6400 and 25600.  But essentially my numbers were about right. 

Basically only 2% earn more than 25600, which is essentially the base point for anyone wanting to buy a 500k property. 

And that&#039;s the economically active population... what % of south african are unemployed. :/

j.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian, thanks for that. </p>
<p>The issue with those stats is the huge gap between 6400 and 25600.  But essentially my numbers were about right. </p>
<p>Basically only 2% earn more than 25600, which is essentially the base point for anyone wanting to buy a 500k property. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the economically active population&#8230; what % of south african are unemployed. :/</p>
<p>j.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Frith</title>
		<link>http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/2008/07/31/buying-property-step-3-understanding-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-12325</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Frith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arbitraryuser.com/blog/?p=299#comment-12325</guid>
		<description>I pulled some income figures from the Stats SA Census 2001 interactive site at http://www.statssa.gov.za/census01/html/C2001Interactive.asp and munged them in OOo Calc:

55% of the (economically active and aged 15--65) population earns less than R1600 a month. Another 33% earn between R1600 and R6400; and 10% earn between R6400 and R25 600. About 1% earn between R25 600 and R51 200, and the last 1% earn more than R51 200.

Of course, these are 2001 Rands, so some adjustment might be needed for inflation and changes in the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pulled some income figures from the Stats SA Census 2001 interactive site at <a href="http://www.statssa.gov.za/census01/html/C2001Interactive.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.statssa.gov.za/census01/html/C2001Interactive.asp</a> and munged them in OOo Calc:</p>
<p>55% of the (economically active and aged 15&#8211;65) population earns less than R1600 a month. Another 33% earn between R1600 and R6400; and 10% earn between R6400 and R25 600. About 1% earn between R25 600 and R51 200, and the last 1% earn more than R51 200.</p>
<p>Of course, these are 2001 Rands, so some adjustment might be needed for inflation and changes in the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

